|
From
No Sharia:
Preventing
Islamization Europe Page 1
Preventing
Islamization Europe Page 2
Preventing
Islamization Europe Page 3
Islamization of European Union and Policies to Prevent
It, Part 9
POLICY AREA 12:
SECURITY POLICY PART C
Parts
A 12.1 BACKGROUND
A 12.2 CERTAIN GOALS FOR A NEW European Union
FOREIGN POLICY
B 12.3 More about goals and policies
C 12.4 Certain goals for an European Union
security policy
C 12.5 POLICIES NECESSARY TO REALIZE THE GOALS
IN 12.4
D 12.6 THE ENDGAME: NEVER AGAIN
12.4
CERTAIN GOALS FOR AN European Union SECURITY
POLICY
12.4.1 The Great Civil War in European Union
The conflicts between Islamists and other followers of
traditional Islam, which is the real Islam, and
non-Muslims in various countries in European Union, grew
during the first decades of the 21st century.
The larger the Muslim parts of the populations grew in
various countries, the more radicalized (in this case:
true to its doctrine) they became. No effective policies
prevented that parallel Muslim societies became strong
in different parts of European Union, and forced the
governments to make many concessions and give privileges
to Islamists. The political development in European
Union therefore followed the process described in Part
1. The way in which individual governments made
themselves free of the restrictions put on them by
European Union and its administration, was described in
sect.12.3 p.14.
After decades of protests and demonstrations, a number
of violent acts against political adversaries including
murders of political opponents, developed into frequent
physical fights between Islamists vs. police and private
militias, and later into firefights. The frequency of
terrorist acts against the general non-Muslim population
increased. In some countries, this phase E (or ph. 5)
of the Islamization process of European Union led to
armed insurrections (phase F (also called ph. 6)) which
grow organically from the demonstrations, conflicts,
fights and terrorist acts. After a period, even heavy
weapons were used, and the fights between Islamists and
the military and other forces soon developed into
regular civil wars [phase g., (also called ph. 7)].
In the countries where this occurred, city after city
were partly (or mostly) destroyed in the fighting.
During the conflicts, it was discovered that the
concentration of Muslims to certain larger cities, and
there often to parts of the cities, was a blessing. Few
wars have been won by mainly occupying cities - by
static forces - with few industries and no natural
supply of food or other necessary resources. The
fighting rapidly became very brutal, and a hundred
Fallujahs appeared in European Union. The civil wars in
various countries were extremely violent and cruel, and
the destruction of the cities severe, when block after
block had to be reconquered by the European Union.
In a few countries where socialists/social democrats and
social liberals still held power despite electoral
setbacks, the weak reactions of the governments led to
the Islamists gaining ground. This caused the
governments to fall, and
conservative/nationalist/classical liberal/libertarian
parties took over the political power. However, at that
stage these had – like the French government after
Dunkirk in 1940 - great difficulties to stabilize the
military situation, and it could be done only at a great
cost in human lives. The larger parts of these countries
were taken over by Islamists.
But in other countries, the strategic and tactical
situation of the Islamists generally deteriorated slowly
after some months of fighting, and specially when
regular European Union military forces were mobilized
and trained. The shortage of heavy weapons and regular
military knowledge of the Islamists were only two
factors. Their strategic and tactical thinking was often
inadequate and couldn't compensate for a number of
weaknesses of the Muslim forces. The solidarity between
most European Union nations was now strong; help was
given by a number of countries with better domestic
political situations; and in the end also American
troops helped to crush the Islamists. The American
troops were specially helpful in countries where the
Islamists had nearly taken over the political power
because of the weaknesses and mistakes of earlier
governments. The help from Muslim countries to the
Islamists was also often prevented to reach them thanks
to the American forces surrounding European Union. An
iron ring protected European Union against interventions
from the outside.
The centers of resistance were systematically attacked
and subdued but it took much longer for the European
Union forces to reconquer cities than for the American
Marine Corps to conquer Fallujah in 2004. As a matter of
fact, the tempo of the fighting, the treatment of
prisoners etc hade many more similarities to the fight
for Tammerfors in March-April 1918 (during the Finnish
civil war) than to Fallujah in 2004. And the worse the
atrocities carried out by the Islamists became, and the
longer the fighting continued, the more radicalized
became the European Union population. As always, civil
wars cause the most intense hatred between the parts of
the population which fight each other.
Granada II
Soon after the first outbreak of hostilities between the
home guard plus army units and the Islamists, slogans
like “ Granada II”, “Granada, not Palestine” were heard.
They became more and more common and were soon
incorporated among the goals of many
non-Muslim political organizations and parties. The
people saying ,e.g., “Granada, not Palestine” had
realized that the European Union policy regarding PLO
and the Palestinian refugees during more than half a
century had in reality only led to the preservation of a
problem, and not to any kind of solution. No similar
destructive so-called peace process could ever be
accepted in European Union between Muslims and
non-Muslims.
The European Union public had at that point of time also
understood the Islamic policy of “hudna”, a method – a
truce for awhile - used when Islamists are weak, so they
can regain their strength and then again fight for the
Islamization of European Union. The socialists/social
democrats and social liberals could not explain to the
public why such a privilege should be given to
Islamists when these were weak. Most people understood
that it was important to crush them when they had become
weak, in order to be able to solve the problem for ever.
So these slogans could be heard from the lips of an ever
increasing number of European Unions. But other – less
drastic - solutions were naturally also formulated.
Contributing Reasons
A number of factors contributed to the dramatic
radicalization of the attitudes of the European Union
electorate. The fact that the dislike by the European
Unions of the activities of many Muslims had been
suppressed by various laws for so long, led to a special
intensity in the hatred of the Islamists. The contempt
and disgust for so many Islamist thoughts, actions and
rules had hardened during the earlier decades, and
suddenly people were allowed to show what they really
thought. The large number of terrorist acts during the
earlier decades, and the atrocities during the armed
insurrections and the civil wars in various countries,
had also exhausted the patience of the tolerant European
Union citizens.
The refusal of so many of the so-called mainstream, or
moderate, Muslims, to accept any kind of responsibility
for the Muslims following what was said to be another
interpretation of Islam – political Islam/Islamism - and
the general unwillingness of Muslims to help the police
and intelligence services to identify and find
Islamists, had revealed the emptiness of the claim that
Islam basically is a religion of peace and tolerance.
Many moderate Muslims just felt unable to act against
Islamists who, regarding so many issues, in reality have
the full weight of the Islamic doctrine behind them. To
be a moderate Muslim was in many cases revealed to be
just a cultural habit easily discarded if the faith of
the person for any reason became stronger. That many
Muslims didn't act as citizens, instead of being passive
or active allies of the terrorists, was more damaging to
the cause of Islam in European Union than anything else.
Most people had during the earlier decades also
understood the method to argue that the Islamists and
many other Muslims employ, and how these rules are used
in all discussions and dialogues with non-Muslims. So
,e.g., a favorite method like the role of a victim of
the brutal actions by non-Muslims was no longer credible
to European Unions. People understood that these Muslims
were instead victims of their own often primitive values
and their interpretation of the religious doctrine.
The growing understanding that the fight for Islam also
– to a considerable extent – was a fight for the
goals of an Arab imperialism aiming at the
domination of European Union using Islamicization as a
method, also mobilized the European Unions.
12.4.2
Goals for a successful security
policy
12.4.2.1 A basic goal
Every European Union shall understand that every act of
Islamic terrorism in European Union countries is a proof
of the failure of the immigration and integration
policies of the earlier – and current – socialist/social
democratic and social liberal governments.
The parties of social liberalism and
social democracy have clearly shown what their true
values are i e that they lack the important values
which make it mandatory to protect the European Union
populations against all threats including religious
ones.
Their refusal also to
respond effectively to the Islamicization efforts by
Muslim organizations is unforgivable.
These governing parties have – because of their
ideology/dislike of the market economy/dogmatism/a
special interpretation of multiculturalism - put
European Union and the European Union civilization in an
extreme danger. And when the catastrophic consequences
started to appear in various countries, the national and
local governments tried to suppress the reactions of
their European Union citizens by curtailing their human
rights like freedom of expression (disguised as laws
against hate speech), freedom of assembly ,e.g., the
planned large anti-Islamist demonstration in Brussels
070911. But every suppression of the political rights of
European Unions is another proof of the shipwreck of the
policies formulated by political establishments in many
countries. These politicians tried to conceal that they
had not told the truth to their peoples about the many
serious consequences of the mass-immigration of Muslims.
All these repressive measures were only self-serving
measures intended to conceal the pending catastrophe,
when it appeared more and more likely.
The political parties which are responsible for these
policies, have committed such mistakes owing to
fundamental errors in their ideologies and approach to
politics, that they can never again be trusted with the
power to influence the political directions of the
nations of European Union. To make the European Union
population understand this basic fact, and how these
parties compromised the European Union security, is now
not only a political goal but in reality a true national
security goal. The irresponsibility of these parties
have put the European Union continent into an extreme
danger threatening the political and cultural, and
therefore even the national survival of many countries.
12.4.2.2
To fight against Arab imperialism disguised as a
religion
Why the Islamist and traditional interpretation of real
Islam must be fought has been explained earlier. But
Islam is - besides a religion – also the weapon of an
Arab imperialism realizing the goals of Arab
political organizations/parties, and also some
governments ,e.g., Saudi Arabia. It is the basic
motivation of many Muslims who don't take the religious
aspects of Islam very seriously. They have understood
that their religion is basically a method to conquer
other countries, and that the religious aspects are
highly useful to reach this goal.
This explains what so many European Unions cannot
understand: Why many Muslims who individually seem
moderate from a religious point-of-view, anyway support
the Islamists ? It is not only the fact that the Islamic
doctrine regarding so many matters supports the
Islamists - and not the moderates (and the moderates
know that!). These so-called moderates understand the
enormous advantages of belonging to a movement that
takes over the power in an advanced society. Muslims can
then by various methods ,e.g., force, special taxation
etc exploit the property and riches of the non-Muslims.
One consequence is then that just moderation in belief
doesn't necessarily diminish the desire of Muslims
living in the west to participate in taking over a
country using Islam as a method. Non-religious, economic
aspects are also important.
This Arab imperialism threatens the national cultures,
institutions, and habits of many nations. The newly
converted European Union Muslim shall take a new –
Arabic – name; according to Islam he ought to limit his
contacts with his non-Muslim family and earlier friends
(in the way sects generally demand); Allah talks Arabic,
which therefore is the language every Muslim should
learn for religious reasons. The religious ceremonies
are performed in Arabic, and also in Paradise only
Arabic is spoken. The Muslim shall bow towards Arabia
five times per day, and even in death his/her body must
be turned towards Arabia (Mecca). (1)
A number of factors lead to the result that European
Unions who convert, will sacrifice their own culture for
the Arabian one. To earn religious points in order to be
able to go to Paradise, a convert must live like an
Arab, and love Arabia. It has been pointed out that
Muhammad's role as an ideal model of Muslim behavior is
a fundamental cause of Arab cultural imperialism. If the
convert shall behave in the correct manner, he/she shall
imitate Muhammad. That means that his own culture is
abandoned, and the Arabian culture is accepted:
…one must think, feel and act as the Prophet did; one
must develop the same tastes and habits as the Prophet
had; one must even eat, drink, talk, walk, sleep and
look like him in dress and general appearance…………….
The fundamental principle of Islam is…to perpetuate
itself through a permanent strife based on the
distinction of…(the Muslim) and… (the non-Muslim)…. it
becomes the duty of all converts to Islam that they…..
subordinate all their national institutions to those of
Arabia, adopt Islamic law, learn Arabic and Arab
manners; love Mecca and Arabs, to acknowledge Muhammad
as the Model of Behavior because being an Arab he loved
and enforced everything that was Arabian. Still worse,
they must hate their own culture and motherland to such
an extent that it becomes Dar-ul-Harb, i.e. a living
battlefield. In practice it means that they must set up
an opposite camp in their own motherland and fight their
own countrymen until they all surrender … …by embracing
Islam. It is then and only then that the country becomes
Dar-ul-Islam i.e. the Land of Peace; otherwise it
remains a battlefield (Dar-ul-Harb) ….These non-Arab
Muslims develop a special sense of contempt for their
own cultures and motherlands under the pretence of
believing in the Muslim nationhood… (2),
When all aspects are added up, the Arab imperialistic
character of the religion is overwhelming. Arabian
culture and habits slowly strangle the local cultures in
the countries, where Arab immigrants have become
numerous or Islam strong.
And what is then the final, ideal political result of a
global Islamic victory (a result that shall then last
for all the future of mankind) ? Well, in the future
perfect Islamic society and the perfect Muslim
world-state which all Muslims shall work for, one caliph
- a dictator – governs over the world. Democracy is
eliminated. The kaliph shall be an a r a b, and
ideally e v e n c o m e f r o m a c e r t a i
n A r a b t r i b e in Saudi Arabia.
This is the worst kind of political and cultural
imperialism. To withstand this type of invasion
disguised as a global religion, is a vital condition for
the survival of European Union.
12.4.2.3
Important goals for a security policy
Some general security goals of the European Union
nations follow from the basic foreign policy goals
expressed in sect. 12.2. We will not treat the more
specific and detailed security goals but will limit the
discussion here to the basic – but in the long run most
important - goals which must form the backbone of a
security policy regarding a European Union where human
rights are respected.
The violations of the human rights of individuals –
Muslims or non-Muslims - caused by the real, traditional
interpretation of Islam, also have as a purpose to
undermine the western society, and pave the way for an
Islamic society. These crimes can therefore be viewed as
a part of the warfare against the non-Muslim society and
similar in their long-term a i m to terrorist attacks
and military resistance. A resolute defense of
freedom and the human rights of every resident – Muslim
or non-Muslim - is therefore necessary, and seen as part
of a b r o a d l y d e f i n e d security policy.
The rules and policies against: (a) violations (caused
by the religion) of the human rights of family members,
(b) non-physical religious hate crimes (see Policy Area
4), (c) crimes against integration (Policy Area 6), or
(d) against sexual equality in order to uphold sexual
apartheid (Policy Area 3), belong to the soft part of a
broad security policy (SP Part I). Physical attacks
against property or people caused by religious
considerations, terrorist acts, and military
insurrections belong to activities which form the hard
part of the security policy (SP Part II).
For example, religiously based (or accepted) crimes
against Muslims – often family members – allow the
Islamists to counter integration attempts and keep a
parallel society (Muslims following a Muslim agenda and
Sharia rules, and not western law) intact and therefore
as a resource, or weapon, to be used against the secular
state. The effects of, e.g., honor killings are –
besides upholding a primitive and at the same time
childish honor concept - to preserve the power of men
over women and by that an important part of the profound
collectivism of the Islamic society with few individual
rights. Honor murders are also political statements.
There are good reasons to see such acts as part of the
Islamization efforts of Muslims in European Union, and
politically different in kind but not in aim, to
terrorism and insurrections.
An unconditional defense of human rights in all nations
of European Union is therefore part of a broad security
policy. A proactive zero-tolerance policy regarding
all violations of human rights in European Union
countries and with the main attention directed to such
violations by Muslims, shall be realized by the full
force of the state. It constitutes part I of the
security policy (also see 12.2 p.3A). Religious hate
crimes (see Policy Area 4), crimes against integration
(see Policy Area 6: sect.2) and also crimes aiming at
upholding sexual apartheid according to Muslim rules
(see Part 2: sect 4.3), shall be specially observed.
The Muslim clergy is vital to the Islamist movement.
Khomeini was right when he said that without the support
of a committed clergy, the Islamic revolution will
weaken, or – in the long run - even disappear. The
efforts of mullahs are important in European Union in
order to build parallel societies and resist
integration. All people who fulfill priestly or
supporting functions in Muslim mosques in European Union
must therefore be given attention and have their
behavior controlled.
All religious
hate crimes by mullahs must be observed and later
punished.
A number of religious hate crimes were discussed in Part
4 (Policy Area 4). The measures
proposed in 12.3 p.10-11 regarding the Muslim clergy are
important. However, religious hate crimes against human
rights are committed by many people, and are the
backbone of the efforts to counteract integration and
keep parallel societies functioning in European Union.
The earlier stated goal is also a security one: “No
parallel societies shall be allowed in any European
Union country” (see 12.2 p.2.4). Without such societies,
Islamism will be drastically weakened. Elimination of
all religious hate crimes against human rights in
European Union is a specially important part of the
proactive zero-tolerance policy mentioned above.
Some goals concerning the hard part of the security
policy (SP Part II) are:
1. Elimination of all major causes of Islamism,
terrorist acts and armed insurrections in European
Union. Arguments saying that terrorism is caused by
factors like the Western policy regarding Israel, are
generally untrue. It has been pointed out that it is not
because of what we do, but because of whom we are, that
western democracies and citizens are hated by Muslims.
A number of extremely important aspects must then be
treated and decided upon. The issue of immigration
naturally has major weight. Immigration cannot any
longer be allowed to create national security risks in
European Union. Considerable changes in today's
immigration policies are necessary (see 12.2 p.9 and
12.3 p.10), and these will be treated in Policy Area 8.
If one speaks about major causes, a basic issue regards
the motivation of Islamists. To
weaken that motivation is to take away the fuel from
Islamists, and in reality nothing is more important from
a security point-of-view than that. It is then of
interest to the European Union nations that the main
psychological pillars of Islamism, which drive the
terrorists to act, are – if not destroyed - at least
weakened. The main motivational factors shall therefore
be identified, and – if possible – their power
eliminated.
This demands that the state is allowed to criticize
various aspects of a religion ,e.g., that suicide
bombers will be rewarded by going to the Paradise. The
state can do that as long as the reason is not to
support any specific religion but that an interpretation
of a specific religion causes numerous crimes against
human rights and political freedom. A policy regarding
the core elements of the Islamist faith which are of
importance for the violent behavior of Islamists, is
formulated and carried out.
Let's just take an example of another general
motivational factor. A powerful reason for many men to
support Islamism is that this ideology fights for k e
e p i n g w o m e n o p p r e s s e d in order to
function as servants to men. Without women to dominate
and kept as servants and second class citizens, the
reason and motivation even to be a Muslim is much
weaker. Women who fulfill the subservient role chosen
for them according to the gender apartheid rules, make
men's life infinitely easier. What this role means is
,e.g., that a man can get a wife without having to show
any personal qualities impressing the woman. Just by
fulfilling something similar to a business transaction,
he will have a subservient and docile servant who even
gives him sexual gratification, and in any way he wants
because she has no right to object. And if the male
chooses not to help the wife with anything at home, that
is also correct also.
The male's whole personal life is influenced by these
gender apartheid rules which many (most ?) Muslim men
approve of. To preserve gender apartheid is then an
extremely important motivational factor for followers
of Islamists, and specially young men. Even if they
have horrible personalities without any good qualities,
they can still get married to an obedient female
servant. Many male Muslims know that their whole life
style is threatened by the western laws and therefore
they want to stop the process of female emancipation. As
long as that seems possible, some will support
Islamists.
However, if it doesn't seem possible to prevent female
emancipation any longer, their attitude and support may
well change because this stand may then cost too much.
Female emancipation also changes women from servants and
second-class persons to independent individuals who can
make individual choices – and therefore perhaps even
decide to fight against Islamists (or at least not
support them). It is for many reasons a national
security goal to make Muslim women equal to men in all
practical aspects. The proactive zero-tolerance policy
regarding ,e.g., all crimes against integration and
religious hate crimes supporting gender apartheid, is
necessary also from this point-of-view. Freer and more
independent women will be an important factor in
eliminating parallel societies, and diminishing the
power basis of the Islamists. In this respect, soft
policy is hard policy.
2. Those parts of the Islamic doctrine which are
contrary to Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and
to the constitution of the specific country and its bill
of rights, are a threat to a peaceful society. They
shall be declared unlawful and therefore not relevant,
and shall not be allowed to be taught or used in any
religious messages, sermons, and other religious
activities etc. The political consequences of the fact
that Islam is a religion very different from all other
important religions, and that many of its theses cannot
be respected, shall be drawn. The issue if traditional
Islam is a sect must be thoroughly examined.
3. The intelligence-, police- and military capacity (the
national protection forces) where a volunteer home guard
will play a key role (see 12.4.3), will be heavily
expanded.
4. An intense cooperation between nations regarding
security and military matters using mechanisms that – in
all probability - are not under the control of European
Union (see 12.2 p.8 and 12.3 p.13) is necessary.
Governments with similar opinions cooperate continuously
and realize a forceful anti-Islamist security and
military agenda in European Union. The legal changes
necessary for the future conflict were described in sect
12.3 p.16.
5. Satisfactory intelligence regarding all
organizations where Islamists may be active must be
collected by the state, and by all available means.
Infiltration of such organizations shall be carried out
wherever it is possible and cost-effective ( also see
12.3 p.15).
6. Strong and continuous efforts to weaken the ability
of all organizations, influenced by Islamists, to
support and/or carry out acts of terrorism, or take part
in military insurrections. Using the traditional enmity
between certain Islamic groups/nationalities may be one
possible method.
7. No European
Union nation shall agree to that “one square centimetre
of European Union soil shall be allowed to be under the
sovereignty of political Islam…..
there shall be no “no-go” areas in European Union”
(see12.2 p 2.3). This regards
dominance by non-elected organizations.
Even if a
government of Islamists was elected, it would soon break
the law by violating the constitutional rights of
individuals, and would then in practice be illegal. But
such parties with a religious agenda that goes against
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or the
constitution of the country, shall not be allowed to
take part in elections (see Policy Area 4).
8. Another goal for the European Union nations is to
support - by all necessary resources - any European
Union country threatened and attacked by Islamists,
according to the principle “One for all, all for one”
(see 12.2 p. 2.2).
9. One
principle guiding the security or military response to
,e.g., armed insurrections is that a proportionate
response is an extremely faulty and dangerous principle.
It just allows the adversary to survive, and keeps the
problem alive. The best principle is often overwhelming
force if such a response can be arranged. Just the speed
that this approach causes, saves many lives in itself.
Another
principle is that the lives of the European Union
soldiers and citizens which support the government,
shall be protected maximally. That principle has
definite consequences for the rules of engagement, and
for tactical military decisions.
10. All other, often more detailed and technical,
security goals.
12.4.3
The National Protection Forces
The period of reduced national resources committed to
defense or national security has now ended. Owing to the
betrayal by the socialist/social democratic and social
liberal governments of the security of the European
Union nations, these must now commit vastly increased
resources for intelligence, internal security and
national defense. Without that betrayal, many relevant
grants could still be held rather low. But ,e.g., a
larger court system, a considerable larger prison
capacity, a larger police force, increased budgets for
internal security, increased resources aimed at
suppressing terrorist acts, a larger army also is a
considerable drain on national resources (besides all
types of support payments and social welfare costs for
such immigrants who are a menace). These expenses would
have been unnecessary with a sensible
immigration/integration policy.
Increased resources are now necessary for:
-
Intelligence/security organizations
-
The local and national police forces
-
A drastically expanded home guard force
-
The army
One of more nations also ought to build a European Union
Protection Force (see below).
The Local Home Guard
A volunteer local/regional home guard shall now form a
much larger part of the total National Protection
Forces. This expanded home guard shall be able to
effectively control the local communities - or even
regions – where it is located, against any armed
activities of Islamists, and if necessary suppress any
rebellion by force. Budget wise, it means a dramatically
increased force, increased compensation for officers and
the soldiers; more and better training; better and
heavier equipment, personal protection vests and
equipment to fight in darkness etc. Because of their
increased responsibilities, a permanent officer corps
with better and longer education, and a larger home
guard administration, is necessary.
The home guard shall permanently be ready to act against
all kinds of threats. When the threats are eliminated,
the soldiers go back home. Such units will make private
anti-Islamist militias much less probable. Private
militias will otherwise form spontaneously when the
conflicts in the society and the terrorist attacks
increase.
The National home guard
A special part of the home guard shall be equipped with
heavy weapons and have a mobile capacity. These units
shall be able to operate over the whole country and
support those local home guard forces which meet special
problems. Together with the local home guard, they shall
be able to reconquer whole communities which have been
taken over by Islamist forces. These heavy units are
given special training. Also these soldiers are all
volunteers and they function as soldiers a certain
number of hours per month. When a crisis has occurred,
they have the right to leave their jobs, become
full-time soldiers and are paid for that dangerous work
to protect the nation.
This part of the home guard is called the National Home
Guard (NHG) in contrast to the ordinary home guard which
has local or regional duties.
The National Army
At a suitable point-of-time during the Islamization
process in a country, conscription shall be introduced,
if it has earlier been eliminated. Military training of
young people leaving school will then start again.
Refresher training of earlier trained persons shall also
be common again. When the fighting has started, a
selective mobilization of men under 50 and who are not
engaged in the home guard, is carried out.
The home guard is an all volunteer force, which train
together during brief periods but during a long period
of time, and have an extraordinary local knowledge. The
units can be mobilized in sometimes less than a day, and
they step down immediately the danger is over. The
infantry in the army has distinct weaknesses in these
respects but has other large advantages ,e.g., longer
continuous training, regular support of heavier weapons
(armor, artillery etc) and training in large units
together with other arms including the Air Force. The
longer a civil war will last, the more important will
the conventional army become.
A European Union Protection Force
One or two European Union nations shall organize a
European Union Protection Force (EPF) consisting of
volunteers from any nation in the world. The enlisted
men in EPF will consist of trained soldiers, or just
untrained volunteers interested in becoming soldiers and
protecting freedom and democracy in European Union from
internal threats. They shall be paid a low salary, and
the units shall be under a very strict discipline. They
shall be able to fight anywhere in European Union. The
aim is to create an elite force with weapons that allow
it to reconquer and dominate any community or region in
European Union, which is under attack, or has been
conquered, by Islamists. Because of their extremely high
motivation, background and training, these professional
soldiers can be exposed to any hardships and dangers in
their fight to preserve freedom in European Union. They
shall be able to form the vanguard in every fight
against Islamists, as long as regular national army
units are not available.
Such units can be created just for the need of one
country but it is desirable and advantageous from the
viewpoint of economies-of-scale if a larger force is
trained in one place but – if needed – can work
everywhere in European Union. For that reason, the
nation that creates this force shall let other nations
contribute to the financing of it, and some may be
willing to do just that just as a national insurance
premium. At the request of a specific government, (part
of) the force is lent out to that country. Its goal is
then to help that government to prevent or suppress any
Islamist uprisings there, and to assist in tracking down
and apprehending all Islamists in a region. While these
units then are under the command of the military
representatives for the government of the specific
country, they will fight as separate units, and under
their own officers.
This capacity will be of considerable help to any
government which tries to fulfill the goals of not
allowing even one square centimeter of European Union
soil to be under the sovereignty of political Islam, or
assisting in eliminating armed rebellions etc caused by
,e.g., the refusal of the Islamists to dissolve various
parts of a parallel society in a country. Vers.070819
________________________
(1)
http://www.Islam-watch.org/AnwarSheikh/Islam-Arab-Imperialism7.htm
(2)
http://www.Islam-watch.org/AnwarSheikh/Islam-Arab-Imperialism7.htm
|
