|
Review: UNHOLY ALLIANCE:
Radical Islam and the American Left
By David Horowitz
(Regnery Books, N.Y.; 2004; ISBN: 0-89526-076-X)
What happened to the Nazis and Nazism after the
collapse of the Third Reich?
Did they go away, or just go
underground? What happened to
communists and communism after
the collapse of the USSR?
David Horowitz*, in Unholy
Alliance, tells us.
He does not address the Nazis as much he
does the Reds, but his
presentation allows inclusion of
both.
And the answer is that their intellectual
heirs are living and well in
America and Europe. Just as the
Nazis and Communists in Pre-Nazi
Germany were two sides of the
same coin, so they are here as
well. Remember that “NAZI”
stands for NSDAP, which
means “National SOCIALIST
German Workers Party,” and
remember that fascism, including
its Nazi variant, and communism
come from the same
intellectual root stock:
SOCIALISM.
All of these virulent socialists have
reemerged from the collapse of
the old left and old communism
to form what Mr. Horowitz
properly calls the “neocommunists,”
or “neocomms.”
The neocomms, however, have
devolved from their pining for
the new world order of old
communism to raw
nihilism—destruction of
everything. Their goal is to
destroy America and everything
it stands for, and now they have
new partners.
The new partners are the Islamic jihadists,
who want exactly the same
thing: The destruction of
America and all it stands for.
This is the hardcore
FIFTH COLUMN,
with many strap-hangers along
for the ride. This is the
UNHOLY ALLIANCE David Horowitz
presents. And, hold your hats,
the Unholy Alliance is WINNING.
If we don’t get off our
derrieres, we are going to be
herded into a totalitarian state
worse than any of those in the
20th century, and we
will be bowing to Mecca five
times a day.
The Unholy Alliance members are
organized, and they are speaking
with one voice, from one sheet
of paper, as the expression
goes. We Americans are not
organized, nor are we speaking
from the same sheet of paper.
We are divided, in part by the
effect of our own ignorance,
direct effects philosopher John
Dewey unleashed on American
education (from K-12 and through
all of the teachers colleges,
and into the university system),
and the total takeover of
academia and all media by
neocomms. In short, we are
facing a principled and
consistent leftist alliance
combating US, an under-principled and very
inconsistent America and West.
If we do not become fully
principled, and very consistent
in their application, we will
lose to this new Fifth
Column.
Unholy Alliance rips the scab
off the neocomm-jihadist fusion
and exposes it to the light of
truth in a short, easy to
digest, and potent book. You
cannot read this book and stick
your head in the sand again.
You cannot read this book and
try to find middle ground or
otherwise compromise with your
destroyers. You can read this
book and get up fighting mad and
ready to fight effectively for
America.
David Horowitz grew up in a household with
American communist parents, and
he became a communist. In the
1960s, he became one of the
neocommunists and remained one
into the 1970s until he got a
blinding flash of reason and
realized the logical
consequences of his allegiance
and behavior. Because of his
past, however, he knows these
people in and out. He can tell
the tales better than anyone
else around. When David speaks,
we should listen.
American intellectuals embraced communism and the Soviet
Union in the 1920s and 1930s
with a blind adulation that
makes me want to vomit. World
War II killed communism as a
movement, and Stalin’s excesses
grossed out even the communists
and comsymps or fellow
travelers. Communism after WWII
ceased as a movement.
Subsequently, the failures of
socialism around the world
became obvious even to the left,
and it died also as a movement
but not as a force still
exerting influence by default.
The death of old communism left
many ideologically homeless.
These homeless did not blame the
failed ideologies at all. As Ed
Asner said on the radio, they
said that the practitioners had
failed, not the ideology—the
ideology had not been practiced
correctly, they firmly believed
and believe. This is a major
thought disorder neocomms have
in common, and they cannot be
persuaded from it by reason any
more than a schizophrenic can be
reasoned out of schizophrenia.
These ideologically homeless coalesced into
the New Left, or
neocommunists. They retained
their love for totalitarian
(“utopian”) ideas and their
hatred for America and
capitalism. Their practice
became “creative destruction,” a
concept stolen from capitalism
and perverted to mean
“nihilism.” They hate the
present and live in the future.
They want to destroy the present
world. They hate reality—the
world as it IS. They
actually believe that they
have to destroy America to make
it well, which is warmed
over Marxism. Believe me, there
is nothing original with these
people. Their primary goal is
NIHILISM,
destruction for the sake of
destruction, sweetened with some
pie-in-the-sky future
fantasizing about eventually
finding their utopia of no
needs, no wants, no differences,
no poverty, no wealth, no
disruptive progress, and just
static ecstasy— like Islam’s
Paradise. For now, they want
nihilism, hating the good for
being good, like Islam.
Neocomms began populating academia in the
1970s, becoming a major
influence in academia in the
1980s. By the turn of the 1990s
they had taken over the academic
fountainhead. It was they who
launched “political correctness”
and “multiculturalism.” It was
they who played the race and
gender cards in every contest,
no matter how inappropriate. It
has been they who took over the
minds of the
"humanities" graduates,
journalists, and politicians.
They have successfully bullied
the morally uncertain, who now
bend obsequiously to political
correctness, to get their way.
That is why we have this
epistemological, moral, and
political relativism mess today.
Neocomms really believe that they had been
given a green light during the
tenure of the Clinton
administration, when they felt
their kind had come into their
own, in and out of office. They
proliferated during this period,
inserting themselves into every
nook and cranny in America that
they could. (A Kerry presidency
would have utterly revitalized
them, and they would have had
carte blanche to damage
us terribly during his
presidency). They took over the
Democrat Party and began
converting it to what it appears
to be today which looks more day
by day like America’s
Nazi party, replete
with Brown Shirts and Brown
Skirts, even involving a number
of rank and file Democrats who
became “Kristallnachters”
during the 2004 election season,
and even after the election.
They have sought and crave power
wherever it could and can be
begged, bought, or stolen. Like
jihadists, they need raw
physical power to survive.
Meanwhile, in 1979, Khomeini in Iran
launched the jihadism we face
today, financed by Iranian oil,
aided and abetted by the Sunni
Wahhabists in Saudi Arabia, with
the consent and funding of the
Saudi regime. Islamic nihilism
burst onto the world.
Since 11 September 2001, the neocomms and
the jihadists in America fused
to achieve the same symbiotic
end. The two are almost
indistinguishable in content,
rhetoric, and behavior. As a
result, we have a ferociously
dangerous FIFTH COLUMN
in America and throughout the
West. We have organizations
like the American Civil
Liberties Union, National
Lawyers Guild, and Center for
Constitutional Rights, ANSWER,
Not In My Name, Code Pink,
AFCSME and other unions, and
many others, linking with
the United Nations, Council for
American-Islamic Relations,
Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim
Students Association, Hamas,
Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic
Jihad and many others.
Some of these names are from the
book, and others I have added
because of their obvious
neocomm-jihadist orientation.
Joining them are strap-hanger
Fifth Columnist
comsymps in the
Democrat Party such as Al Gore,
Jimmy Carter, and the Democrat
Party dumpling, Michael Moore,
as well as almost half the U. S.
Senate. The bulk of American
journalism—print and
broadcast--vibrates in sympathy
and support, and almost all of
American education at all levels
dances to the neocomms-jihadist
tunes. This is not “conspiracy
theorizing.” It is fact, and
Horowitz proves the case.
Their plan is first to paralyze America with legal and
moral-appearing means. Then
they will move in to kill the
paralyzed beast of America.
Mr. Horowitz makes the case and names the
names. He threatens this
fifth column so much
that they have launched a
campaign to discredit him and
this book. Just that behavior
alone should make you run out
and buy the book.
The final chapter concerns secessionism. To
the neocomms-jihadists, the goal
is to destroy patriotism so that
the citizens can secede from the
ideas of and the physical
existence of America. Read it
for yourself. Mr. Horowitz
quotes these people liberally
here, and throughout the book,
because they mince no words
about their ideas and intents.
We who love individual freedom, capitalism,
and the Constitution of the
United States have a clear
obligation to defend our
values. We start by erasing
ignorance and sharpening our
awareness. While doing this, we
become activists. We start
pushing back--in the press, on
the air, and in every way we
can.
We fight back with the
correct intellectual ammunition.
Our ideas are better, and we
must make them highly visible
and dominant. This book is
a valuable piece of that
intellectual ammunition.
Never forget that they are
winning, NOT BECAUSE THEIR IDEAS
ARE BETTER, but because they are
being consistent. Our ideas are better, and with
consistent application of
reason, we will win.
David Horowitz is the President of the Center for
the Study of Popular Culture and
editor of Frontpagemag.com, an
on-line magazine, which receives
over 4.5 million page views a
month. He has spoken at more
than 200 colleges and
universities, and has appeared
on Nightline, Crossfire, Today,
Good Morning America, C-SPAN,
CNBC, Fox News Channel and CBS’s
This Morning, and gives hundreds
of interviews yearly on radio
and television. He has authored
numerous books and has started
organizations to restore free
speech to academia and to
correct the drift of the
Democrat Party to the aggressive
socialist left.
|