|
Fundamental Ideas Needed to Turn Normal People into
Muslims
(A 6-Part Series)
Part I: Introduction
and Metaphysics
Introduction
Islam and war have always been inseparable and
indivisible. Islam's history is one of conflict. These
days, almost all global hotspots involve Islamists
"acting out" pure Islam.
Islamic bellicosity comes from its content, its basic
principles. The rot starts at its very roots and works
itself into all of the rest of Islam.
In sum, Islam is a war on philosophy:
* War on reality (metaphysics)
* War on reason and the human mind (epistemology)
* War on the self (ethics)
* War on human freedom (politics)
* War on life itself (esthetics)
The terms in parentheses are the names of the five major
branches of philosophy. "Philosophy studies the
fundamental nature of existence, of man, and of mans
relationship to existence. As against the special
sciences, which deal only with particular aspects,
philosophy deals with those aspects of the universe
which pertain to everything that exists. In the realm
of cognition, the special sciences are the trees, but
philosophy is the soil which makes the forest
possible." [See Ayn Rand's, Philosophy: Who
Needs It, Signet Books, 1982.] (Emphasis is
mine). In short, when one assails philosophy as Islam
does, there can be no more fundamental attack, with no
more devastating consequences.
Islam's 1400 year existence convinces many Muslims that
Islam is superior and is winning its goal of conquering
the world. There are easily understood reasons why
Islam has endured and why it is attractive to some
people these days and why it is currently so active in
the world. These will be dealt with later on.
Islam, however, is not winning. It is in the fight for
its life. It faces extinction, and Islamists know it.
But, few of them -- or us -- know the real reason why
Islam is starting to fail, and will fail completely in
time. It comes down to a very simple principle: No one
can make war on reality indefinitely. Anyone warring
against reality may win battles, but cannot win the
war. Reality always wins in the end.
If we get into the basic roots of Islam, we can see what
makes it "tick," so to speak, as well as contrasting it
with Americas philosophy as it operates in ordinary
Americans and use our knowledge to accelerate Islam's
demise. Some technical terms must be used, but they
will be used sparingly here and there. A few must be
defined and clarified in the interest of understanding.
Philosophy can and must be understood by the average
citizen, because it is so vital to the life of each and
every one of us. Philosophy has five major branches,
all of which can be studied independently, but which are
integrated in real life.
The five branches of philosophy are:
* Metaphysics: This is the most fundamental branch of
the five. It deals with the most basic laws that govern
reality, i.e., absolutely everything that exists. For
example, physics, which is the science which studies
matter, depends on the basic principles and facts of
metaphysics; but, metaphysics, which is much more basic
than physics, does not depend in any way on physics.
* Epistemology: Epistemology studies what constitutes
knowledge and how people acquire knowledge.
* Ethics: Everyone has some acquaintance with ethics,
i.e., the principles of right and wrong, good and evil.
Ethics is the evaluative branch of philosophy and
depends on metaphysics and epistemology.
* Politics: Politics concerns how individuals should
live together in a society. Politics is ethics applied
to social behavior.
* Esthetics: This branch deals with beauty (art), a
crucial factor in human existence, and depends on
metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.
These are snap-shot descriptions. They should become
much clearer as this multi-part set of articles wends
its way through each branch as each pertains to Islam.
Root Rot (Part 1, Metaphysics)
Everything starts somewhere. Certain facts are so basic
that they underlie absolutely everything. They are so
basic that they cannot be avoided or refuted. In fact,
one has to use them while trying to refute them.
Philosophers call these basic facts and principles
metaphysics, and metaphysics is the most basic branch of
philosophy.
To get the "flavor" of Islamic metaphysics, it helps to
note that Islam condemns life on earth and enjoyment of
life on earth. It denies pleasure, joy, and happiness
during life, but provides them to those who make it into
Islamic Heaven or Paradise. Islam values the afterlife
and the death needed to reach the afterlife. Islam
replaces this world, the one people perceive directly,
with another world, one they do not know and cannot
know.
If you ask people at random what reality is, people will
look around and point out, with great sweeps of the
arms, all of the "thises" and "thats" which are readily
obvious. Reality is this, they point out. Ask them if
they can provide any evidence for any other reality, and
they may try but really cannot.
Islamists claim that reality is Allah, who is their god,
and Allah is the source of all that exists and all that
happens. Any Muslims raison d'etre is service to Allah
on earth and joining Allah at death. In fact, the
highest form of living is warring on behalf of Allah,
i.e., Jihad, and dying in the process as a martyr,
shahid.
Human beings, according to Islam, were created solely to
worship and work for Allah. However, human life and
fate have been pre-determined by Allah, while each
person is in utero. One may not change ones course of
life or fate; the best one may do is to accept ones
pre-determined fate with grace.
According to Islam, Allah exists in an unknowable state,
having created the universe and its contents, and
determined all actions in the universe. Allah has
extraordinary qualities of omniscience, omnipotence,
infallibility, and being all good. Islam owes this part
of its metaphysics to Platonic and Neo-Platonic
influences.
The practical effect of this mystical metaphysics comes
from the fact that it separates Muslims from reality.
What Muslims perceive, Islam disvalues. Non-life,
Heaven, Hell, and Allah and his qualities are what Islam
values.
Islamic "reality" is populated by unknowable spirits,
who create a nightmare universe, starting with the chief
spirit, Allah. Allah employs angels and jinni. The
Jinni create pain and suffering in human lives. Lurking
about is the evil eye also, just to keep Muslims
paranoid, I suppose. Lastly, there is the chief baddie,
Satan, also known in Arabic as "Iblis." Guess who runs
Hell? Is it Satan? No, it is Allah himself! Allah
personally manages Hell, and he rises to his creative
excellence in the numbers and varieties of Hells
punishments he can inflict on mankind.
It is worth noting that Allah, the jinni, and the evil
eye come from pagan sources. Iblis and angels come from
pagan as well as Christian and Jewish sources. These
spirits were imported whole cloth into Islam by a
superstitious Muhammad. Allah was a moon god who lived
in the black meteorite in the Kaaba and was one of 360
pre-Islamic gods.
In all things, Allah acts by whim, to do or to undo
anything, at anytime, independent of human
understanding, wishes, prayers, or desires. Allah wants
doubters and apostates of Islam killed by decapitation.
Allah demands full obedience by Muslims, or He will
punish them severely. Threats, punishments, Hell, Fire,
and torture consume Allah's attention, and create the
mood of Islam for Muslims.
The Islamic world is malevolent, and it is filled with
fear and terror. It is run by unknowable spirits who
can make anything happen to anything at any time.
Nothing is stable. Nothing is predictable. Surprise
horrors can come unsummoned. Any deviation from
obedience to Allah by deed, by thought, or even by
desire or dream merits severe punishments. If you are
illiterate and ignorant, as most Muslims are, the
Islamic world runs rife with bizarre and unpredictable
identities and events. Such a universe creates chronic,
inner terror.
Contrast this view of Islamic metaphysics with a truly
reality-based metaphysics. Technically, this is called
the primacy of existence metaphysics. In this real
reality, identities are inherent in each thing and
things are caused by the entities acting only as their
identities or natures allow, not by some spirits whim.
The primacy of existence metaphysics means that reality,
existence, i.e., all of the universe, reigns supreme
over any entity's desires, whims, wishes, will, etc.,
i.e.., consciousness. Reality is first, last, and
always. Reality is everything, and it is all there is
it is the universe. There is nothing outside the
universe. There is nothing which is unknowable or
omnipotent or omniscient or infallible or all good.
What is, exists, and if it exists, it has some specific
identity. Nothing that exists is without identity,
without a specific nature; as Ayn Rand stated, "To be is
to be something specific." If it has an identity, it
can do only those actions which its nature permits.
America is a culture based on a primacy of existence
metaphysics, which, of course, includes mans nature.
America fulfills Aristotle's famous dictum: A is A,
which was his way of expressing the metaphysical Law of
Identity. Sir Francis Bacon, hundreds of years ago,
made the statement: "Nature, to be commanded, must be
obeyed." Capitalist America and Americans have followed
Bacon's law better than anyone. Contrast America to
Islam, to any of Islam.
Islam has a very different metaphysics. Islam takes
Aristotle and twists his saying into something like, A
is not necessarily A; it can be whatever, whenever. For
Islam, existence is not stable. Identities shift worse
than sand dunes; they are like lava lamp contents. The
only consciousness that counts is that of Allah, which
accounts for absolutely all of everything. Technically,
this is called the primacy of consciousness metaphysics.
Allah is unknowable, has no identity, and has qualities
which are mutually contradictory as well as internally
contradictory. Islam creates a nightmare universe which
succeeds beautifully in instilling metaphysical terror
in Muslims. That is its goal.
Such metaphysical terror serves the important purpose of
paralyzing Muslims minds in order to make them
tractable. The purpose of Islam is to rule mankind.
First, mankind needs to be made rule-able. Islam starts
by rendering man's ties to reality useless to him. Only
then will men shift conscious control over themselves to
something outside themselves.
But, Islam has just begun. It shakes man's certainty by
shaking his reliance on reality. This step is
necessary, but it is not sufficient. What must be done
next is to destroy is only tool of survival: his mind.
Islam attacks man's mind by means of its epistemology,
which we will cover next.
[Any short article, such as this, which deals with such
a complex subject as the metaphysics of Islam must leave
out a number of points. In addition, many arguments for
Allah, such as First Cause, and elaborations of Allah's
extra-ordinary qualities must be saved for more detailed
presentations. The single best recommendation for
further reading is Leonard Peikoff's,
Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand,
Meridian Books, 1991.]
Broken Tools (Part 2, Epistemology)
The principles underlying Islam are only the beginning
of the process of creating Muslim robots out of normal
humans.
In Root Rot , we showed how Islam substitutes Allah's
nightmare universe for the normal one that any Muslim
can look around and see, touch, smell, taste, and hear
in short, experience directly on his own skin. This
step is necessary, but it is not sufficient; it is just
a beginning. To make Muslims truly tractable, Islam
must take over Muslims' (human) means of survival their
minds, the greatest of all threats to Islam. To achieve
this, Islam attacks knowledge and the means by which it
is acquired.
Those things which constitute knowledge and how it is
acquired make up the second branch of philosophy, which
is known as "epistemology." In the real world,
knowledge is solely a product of human consciousness,
and it always begins with sensory input.
By contrast, Islam asserts that knowledge comes from
Allah by revelation, a claim which bypasses every human
means of acquiring knowledge and understanding.
Revealed "knowledge" arrives by some unknown and some
unknowable means. As a result, no human brain can make
sense of revelation. Revelation bypasses reality.
Revelation requires faith, which requires acceptance of
that for which there is no evidence or proof. Faith and
reason are opposites. Islamists cover their behinds by
saying that such faith illustrates the mysterious and
wonderful ways that Allah works.
Most Muslims are brainwashed by Islam during childhood
in order to derail normal childhood mental development.
Normally, babies deal first in early life with
metaphysics: What is, what is not; object constancy;
etc. As they acquire language, their emphasis shifts to
learning. They love asking and getting the answer to
"What is this?" They identify everything.
Their knowledge starts with data from the world,
including themselves, taken in through their senses.
When mature enough, children create concepts, i.e.,
information, out of the data they take in. As they get
older, they increase the complexity of concepts, thus
increasing their knowledge. Their minds use processes
summed up under the term "reason," which is the
exclusively human means of acquiring and using
knowledge.
Since philosophy was first systematized by Plato and
Aristotle, there have been two radically different
approaches to knowledge. Aristotle's has been correct,
but Plato's has been the more influential throughout
history. Aristotle started with humans born without
innate knowledge. To gain knowledge, humans explore the
real world, gather sensory input, and turn data into
information or knowledge.
The other approach came from Plato. To Plato, all
knowing was fundamentally a process of "remembering."
I.e., humans are born knowing, but not knowing that they
know. People undergo a life-long process of
"remembering." Knowledge itself exists in another,
unknowable world (a world of forms, he said). As nuts
as that is, it greatly influenced Islam. Islam's
variation was that all knowledge came from the other
world by revelation from Allah to a human prophet,
Muhammad, who then passed it on to other humans.
Islam's greatest enemy is the unfettered human mind.
Such minds inquire, deliberate, debate, compare, doubt,
and validate, among many other mental operations in
short, they reason, i.e., correctly identifying and
integrating input from the senses. All operations of
reason threaten Islam. So flimsy are Islam's structure
and content that inquisitive minds can quickly cause it
to collapse. Nobody feels that more than Islamists, and
exposing Islam was a favorite sport of free-thinkers in
early Islamia. Thus, Islamists have dedicated
themselves to undercutting the human mind in their
fellows.
Recall that Islamic metaphysics start by devaluing
reality and valuing unreality. In that unreality are
Allah and other unseen spirits, who create a
controlling, unpredictable, unknowable nightmare
universe. Accepting an idea like this builds
fundamental doubt into Muslim believers. If people can
be made to doubt reality, or at least lose certainty,
that doubt can be extended to the uniquely human means
of survival the mind and its ability to reason.
Spirits, like Allah, angels, jinni, and Satan, make
people doubt their senses: Anything can be anything
else, and nothing is necessarily what it seems.
Revelation is unlike anything people know or
understand. Revelation by-passes the senses. It is a
product of some "unknowable" source. No human mind
works this way; revelation negates human cognition.
Islam assails the validity of the senses, but it leaves
its biggest assaults for human thinking, its greatest
danger.
By 900 A.D., reason had been banished from Islam.
Islamists forbade all doubt about Islam. Apostasy was
met by death, then and now. All forms of doubt and most
manifestations of hypocrisy met with death as well.
Islamic doctrine has always required Muslims to spy on
each other and report any intellectual deviance, which
to this day meets with swift, severe punishment.
Fear of force, particularly death which is metaphysical
extinction -- is used to shut down Muslims' minds, and
to shut them down on principle. It works quite well:
"The virtue of rationality requires one to think, and
then to be guided by his conclusions in action. Force
clashes with both these requirements. Force used to
change a man's mind acts to stop his mind (and thus make
it inoperative as the source of his action). Force used
to change a man's action shoves his mind (and thus its
process of cognition) into the junk heap of the
purposeless. In the one manifestation, the brute works
to detach his victim's consciousness from reality and
therefore from life; in the other, from life and
therefore from reality."[1]
Fear of the universe, fear of using one's mind, and fear
of those who might turn one into authorities who in turn
will inflict severe punishment, including death, haunts
any Muslim who dares to thinks. If he does not think,
he lives at a sub-human level of function, and misses
all that life has to offer. If he thinks, he lives in
chronic fear of discovery. Hell in the afterlife meets
Hell in this life: All Muslims live in fear, whether
they admit it or not, and fear paralyzes the mind.
Apostacy is the greatest sin of Islam. Speaking
critically of any aspect of Islam is a close second.
Even if one escapes Islamia, literally and physically,
one may have a fatwa (a legal warrant) issued for ones
death for apostasy. Leaving Islamia provides no safety,
if they want to find you bad enough. Fatwas for death,
carried out in non-Islamic countries, merit ostentatious
reward back home in Islamia. The method of Islam is to
sustain fear world-wide.
Ignorance and illiteracy add to this attack on the
mind. Education is valued in Islamia only as a means to
render one able to carry out the dictates of Islam. Too
much education endangers Islam because such is likely to
induce the educated to think.
For centuries, Islamists have claimed that the Quran
holds all knowledge possible. Anyone who is not an
apologist for Islam and who has read any version of the
Quran sees the lie in this assertion. But Muslims do as
they are told: They believe. They have no need for
curiosity their minds have been Islamized.
Now all Islam needs to complete creating its robots is a
code of action for each Muslim robot (an ethics) and
social code to guide the mass of Muslim robots (a
politics).
[1] [From Leonard Peikoff, Objectivism: The
Philosophy of Ayn Rand, Meridian Books, 1991]
Obedience Training (Part 3, Ethics)
Nobody can escape the need to "feel right" about what he
does. Nobody can escape the need for ethics. Ethics is
the study of what is "good." It helps people choose a
moral code, a set of values to guide thinking and
behavior. Of all of the five major branches of
philosophy, ethics is the most important on a personal
level -- it does not matter if someone knows nothing
whatsoever about philosophy, ethics, or for that matter,
whether he or she can even read or write: No one
escapes the power of ethics.
Islam's philosophy is not consistent with the demands of
reality. Islam commands Muslims to behave in certain
ways, whether these ways help them in life or not. The
Islamic moral code requires that Muslims be obedient to
Islam, even at the expense of themselves. The ethics of
Islam creates Muslims who serve and defend Islam as
their sole raison d'etre.
Islamic ethics imposes an identity on Muslims that makes
them see themselves as part of a large "Muslim
collective." Being part of the "collective" is the only
identity possessed by each individual. The individual
has no identity outside the "collective." Individual
moral choices are forbidden by Islam.
Islam's code is burned into the minds of children very
early and with great intensity until it crowds out
everything else, and the brainwashing continues
throughout life. It is reinforced five times a day
through ritual behavior of prayer. It reignites
Muslims' raison d'etre when the imams refresh Muslims'
purpose in life every Friday. Emotional fuel comes from
creating scapegoats to hate. Every day and in every
way, Muslims reinforce each other, in families, tribes,
and what passes for society. Belonging to the greater
community of Islam is everything, AND deviance from
Islamism is too terrible to contemplate. Compliance is
bliss.
Islam's personal code tells Muslims (1) to follow
Islam's rules without deviation in order to further
Islam, and (2) to protect Islam at all costs. An
individual has value only with regard to these two
guiding principles. Compliance requires complete
obedience and forbids questions. Every thought and
every activity of daily life must be carried out solely
to serve Islam; how to serve Islam has been spelled out
in excruciating, micro-micro-managerial detail.
One's life has no value beyond one's unquestioning
service to Allah. This is the GOOD. Everything else is
EVIL. The most honorable, most morally pure action a
Muslim can perform is self-sacrificial service to
Islam. The glorious end, which is venerated by all
Muslims, is shahid, or martyrdom, or, death while
fighting for Allah. That is why loony mothers in
Palestine feel such pride when their children complete
their missions as suicide bombers. Everybody glories in
their actions. Upon receiving news of his death, the
parents really believe that the blown-up kid has joined
Allah in Paradise where he is as drunk as a skunk and is
fornicating his brains out with all the houris. Great
social honor befalls the family. And, note: the family
questions only whether their teenager was assigned too
soon, whether the Jihadists should have waited until he
was a little older. Beyond that, the parents are just
pleased as punch that their son has disintegrated
himself.
Second only after Allah, Muslims pay service to and
allegiance to other Muslims, and no one else under any
conditions. This "community of Muslims" transcends all
nationalities and races as well as geographical
locations. It is called the ummah. Selfless, in fact,
self-sacrificial, service to Allah and the ummah = the
Good. Everything else = the Evil.
In a reality-based ethics, man's life is the standard of
value, and the life of each individual is his purpose.
The "good" is that which is consistent with the
requirements of that which furthers life. Reason,
purpose, and self-esteem are the cardinal values, with
corresponding virtues of rationality, productivity, and
pride.
Compare these values and virtues to those of Islam.
Reason and rationality are anathema to Islam. As for
purpose and productivity, remember that this
value-virtue set applies solely to the support of Islam,
not the life of the individual. To see their philosophy
in action, look at Islamia: It makes almost nothing,
and it perpetuates squalor and backwardness.
As for self-esteem and pride, members of Islamic
societies reflect none. Islamia is populated with
"wall-to-wall," unhappy, frustrated Muslims. They have
been made that way by Islam, but they are brainwashed
since early childhood to blame others, not Islam or the
ummah, for their plight. That is why they never correct
anything. To have self-responsibility, one must begin
with self.
Many people confuse what they see in Islamists with
self-esteem and pride. What they see are poor
substitutes for the real things. Theirs are
"pseudo-self-esteem" and variations of "false pride."
In fact, the Arab-Islamic "code of Honor: Shame," viewed
psychologically, reflects that these are the shallowest
people on earth. They experience "shame" and "dishonor"
over any offense, whether real or imagined. Their
mentalities scan the environment for anything that might
be interpreted even as a slight offense. Anything
interpreted as an offense results in a rage response and
a quest for revenge. It goes back and forth endlessly.
Honor, the other side of the same coin, comes from how
their fellows regard each other.
In the Arab-Islamic culture, honor and shame depend on
the consciousnesses of others, not on one's
self-evaluation: "If you like me, then I am worthy; If
you slight me, then I am unworthy unless I kill you or
my family or tribe extracts blood revenge to restore
face with my fellows." These are the ethical standards
and psychodynamics of intellectual midgets. Such
midgets have no concept of self, no self-esteem, and
certainly no rational pride.
Islam decides what constitutes good and evil. Whatever
Allah does is good. Obeying Islam under all
circumstances is good. Islam itself is quintessential
good, because it is the will and word of Allah found in
the Qur'an, the Ahadith, and in the Shariah (laws).
Everything else is evil -- absolutely everything else.
As astonishing as this seems, it is how Islam operates,
and over a billion Muslim robots obey because they
believe.
Ethics exerts enormous power over all humans, and
Islamists know this implicitly from the experiences of
their lives as Muslims. The power of ethics comes from
the profound human need to be morally right. People
must feel that they are living right, behaving right,
and are right with life at large. Islam replaces life
as the standard by which humans should determine the
"good." As a result, all of Muslim thoughts and actions
function to support Islam, not life. Whatever system of
ethics someone adopts, he uses it to feel right by its
standards. This is why a rational ethics is needed so
badly. In America, their ethics explains so much of why
liberals do what they do, and why conservatives do what
they do. Not many people are aware of epistemology and
metaphysics, but they are all aware of ethics -- of
right and wrong, of good and evil. Whether anyone
understands his moral code explicitly or whether his
code is a blur of implicit principles which he cannot
articulate, he will follow it, and it will be his
life-imperative.
We have seen that Islam's metaphysics isolates Muslims'
minds from reality. Islamic epistemology shuts down
Muslims' minds. This allows Islam to program
intellectual-emotional robots, who will live lives of
self-sacrificial obedience.
The robots have been created. All they need are
instructions telling them what to do en masse, as a
collective. The next branch of philosophy, politics,
explains what that is.
Muslim Identity and
Purpose (Part 4, Politics)
Humans live gregariously; we are "herd animals." We
prefer to live among our own kind, even when we treat
each other poorly. There is a problem with living in
groups, however. It is the fact that, as individuals,
animals (including human beings) compete with each other
for resources, whether it is food, territory, or mates.
When animals live in groups, there must be some means of
moderating the competition so that the group can
function in an orderly manner, without unremitting
chaos.
In a wolf-pack, the moderation is accomplished by a
strict mating hierarchy. Among humans, there also
exists a hierarchy: A president, prime minister, or
monarch, for example, is at the top, with other
individuals filling a variety of mutually advantageous
functions, from CEOs to doctors to day-care workers.
Human beings achieve the moderation of disruptive
competition through politics. Politics is one of the
five major branches of philosophy.
Politics applies ethics to social behavior. For
example, if you are alone on a desert island, you would
need an ethics, but you would have no need for a
politics. But, let at least one other person come to
that island, and you would both need guiding principles
for living together successfully. You would need to
apply ethics to social behavior. You would need a
politics.
Politically speaking, Muslims identify themselves as
belonging to a global collective known as the ummah.
This collective transcends all nationalities, races, and
geographic boundaries. The ummah includes all Muslims,
everywhere, as a single unit. The ummah has value,
according to Islam, but the individual Muslim is
expendable. He has value only with respect to his
ability to serve the ummah. Muslims owe allegiance
first to Islam and second to the ummah.
It is a one-way system one-for-all, and all-for-all.
Islam is pure collectivism. It is structurally
identical to communism and the "organic theory of
state." In this "organic theory," the group is the
"organism," while the individual is the "cell." The
organism survives at the expense of the cell.
Islam concentrates its collective power in a three-way
political-social-religious triangle. Whatever state
exists throughout Islamia (dictatorship, Islamic
"republic," etc.), that state is totally fused with and
subordinate to Islam. Shariah, Islamic law based
principally on the founding documents of Islam, is the
only system of law. Islam is a complete system: It is
the state; it is the politics of the state; it is the
religion.
Life in all of its details -- is totally fused with
Islam. Not one single aspect of Muslim life, down to
the tiniest detail, including the proper way to clean
yourself after defecating, escapes Islamic control.
Life must contort itself to fit into Islam, not the
reverse. Life exists to serve Islam; Islam does not
exist to help life.
Muslims have no rights. In Islamia, people live only by
permission. In America, our rights are recognized as
being derived from our nature as human beings. The
fundamental rights are the rights to life, liberty, and
pursuit of happiness.
In America, individual citizens live because it is their
right to live; it is the government that exists by
permission. In Islamia, religion, which is the state,
has all of the power, while the individual has none.
Americans have the freedom, freedom to exercise their
rights on their own behalf. As long as they do not
transgress the rights of anyone else, Americans are
mostly free to do whatever they want. Muslims have only
the freedom to do what the clerics and warlords permit
them to do, and almost every detail of how each Muslim
is to live his life has been spelled out by Shariah.
Islam is at war against rights. Since rights are part
of the very nature of human beings, Islam wages war on
human nature. Islam is a closed circle of death; it is
anti-life and anti-human being. Or, as one of the most
evil men who ever lived, Ayatollah Khomeini, said:
"We must break those pens that teach people there is
something other than divine law. We must smash those
mouths that tell the people they are free to say
whatever they please, regardless of right and wrong with
commands of the Almighty." [Amir Taheri, Holy Terror,
Hutchinson, 1987, p. 204]
And,
"We have to wage war until all corruption, all
disobedience of Islamic laws cease [throughout the
world]. The Qur'an commands: War, war unto
victory." [ibid, p. 113] (All emphases are mine).
"Pagan" America threatens Islam severely by its very
existence, since Americans exercise their rights.
Others around the world find that rights and freedom are
very attractive, to say nothing of the happiness and
prosperity which protection of rights permits. The
reason they find these attractive is, quite simply,
because they are consistent with the nature of life and
humankind, and support rather than suppress them.
What is the purpose of the Islamic collective? It
serves Allah, as spelled out in Islam's founding
documents. Imams mold objectives by stressing one
Islamic commandment over another, and there are many
commandments. What, then, does Allah want Muslims to do
individually and collectively?
The overarching commandment requires that Muslims fight
for Allah. They are to spread Islam where it is not,
and to keep Islam pure where it is. They are to engage
in continuous "holy" warfare or "Jihad." They are to be
completely selfless, so that they may thrust themselves
fully into Jihad without consideration of their own
desires, plans, or lives.
Death in Jihad makes a Muslim a shahid, or martyr.
Islam, as someone once indicated, is the only religion
which requires death of the worshipper in order to reach
martyrdom, which is his ticket to Paradise. Death has
resulted for followers of other religions, but death was
not the goal of the other religions. Allah, Muslims are
told, takes them straight to Paradise as their reward
for shahid. Muslims, we must note, live their earthly
lives in a nightmare universe, where life on earth has
been declared evil, yet where worldly temptations
abound. Fear destroys the integrity of their minds,
then gives them purpose as cogs in the wheel of a
political entity. Death gives them Paradise, an endless
reward.
Beings in a malevolent universe, forbidden to use their
minds, blindly obedient to Islam and stripped of their
identity as humans, these are the Islamic robots primed
for self-sacrificial service. [Please note:
"Sacrifice" means giving up something of greater value
for something of lesser value. Thus, sacrifice is not a
good thing.] Since no individual has value, many
individuals must merge into a mass, like the cells in an
organism, to achieve any meaning or identity. The mass,
the collective, fights for Allah. If one individual
Muslim falls during the fight, another selfless servant
steps forward. They are the Army of Allah, and they
live only to die. Islam makes them dependent. Then it
gives them a reason for being alive: Jihad.
As a group-living species, humans always create
hierarchical social orders. Islam does this as well,
but, as it does with so much else, the hierarchy impedes
life. In Islamia, men count, and almost every concern
of Islam focuses on men. Muslim women can count for no
more than one-half the value of Muslim men. If they are
unmarried, their value approaches zero. Muslim men are
the only Muslims eligible for Heaven, or Paradise,
relatively freely. Muslim women may go to Muslim Heaven
if they have been wives, and if, as wives, they have
never displeased their husbands not even once. Even the
Qur'an indicates that some three-quarters of Muslim
women are bound for Hell, no matter what. According to
the metaphysics of Islam, women are human beings only by
permission of men.
Slaves -- yes, slaves -- count no more than one-half the
value of Muslim women, and the value of the slave is
further degraded by gender. At the bottom of the
hierarchy is the non-Muslim. Non-Muslims count for
nothing. They are "low-hanging fruit," so to speak, to
be conquered, enslaved, robbed and pillaged, murdered
and raped. Slaves, particularly sex slaves, bring good
money, and Muhammad gave the green light to Muslims to
go "get em." Whatever Muslims do to non-Muslims, well,
who cares?
Muslims can admit conquered non-Muslim religious persons
into dhimmitude, if the Muslims are so inclined and do
not want to use the conquered peoples for anything
else. These dhimmis may keep their religion, but must
pay a stiff head tax, jizya, which supports
Muslim goals. Dhimmis may practice their religion, but
they must do so discretely, more or less out of sight,
and in near secrecy. At all times, dhimmis must obey
Muslims as their lords and masters, who hold all power
over them. In fact, dhimmis are subject to mass
extinction by Muslims for almost anything, including a
single whim. Talk about a nightmare universe!
Islamic ethics gives Muslims the moral authority to do
all the horrors we read about, see, and hear about in
the news today. According to their moral code, these
acts, which we consider atrocities, are virtues. All of
these atrocities are not only excused and permitted by
Islam but are actively encouraged.
Americans' preeminent political-social system is
capitalism. In that social-political system,
individuals are supremely important, and each has rights
which its government has been chartered to protect.
America values life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness. These are the values of people who love life
on this earth, in this world. Americans are free,
prosperous, and happy.
Islam is a theocratic totalitarian system that combines
the worst features of fascism and communism, both of
which are collectivist systems. Only the collective
counts, and individuals have value only through their
sacrificial service to the collective. They have no
rights, no freedoms, and no personal liberty. Muslims
live by permission of the Islamic state. Islam hates
life on earth and worships death as a gateway to
another, ineffable, world. Muslims live as sub-humans
because of ISLAM.
Thus far, in this series, we have presented how Islam
makes war on each branch of philosophy, and produces the
indescribably horrible culture of Islam. Islam makes
wars on reality, reason, self, and liberty. What could
be left for Islam to make war on? The answer is that
there is one door to the human spirit that has not been
bolted shut. This door concerns the role of art in the
lives of humans, and Islam conducts war on it also,
because it is life itself. It shows too much. It shows
life as it could be, and as it should be.
Erasing Life (Part 5,
Esthetics)
Art speaks volumes about a culture, particularly about
its dominant ideas, its philosophy. In this regard,
Islamic "art" screams the agony of that culture.
The primary function of art is not to teach, but to
show. While teaching us is not art's primary purpose,
it is an unavoidable by-product of what happens when it
"shows."
The following statements[1] summarize the functions of
art that we need to know in order to diagnose what
Islamic art teaches us:
"An art work tells man that something is
important." (p. 424)
"...Art is a need of the mind." (p. 414)
"The basic purpose of art is to hold up to man
a concretized
image of his nature and his place in the
universe."
(pp. 422-423).
The role of art is " to provide man with a
definite experience
of seeing 'This is what reality is like.'"
(p. 423)
"Art converts abstractions into the equivalent
of concretes
open to direct perception." (p. 419)
"[Man] needs a concrete that can become an
object of
direct experience while carrying with it
the meaning of
his whole view of life." (p. 417)
"...A man needs the integration, the
all-embracing sweep,
the vision of the universe." (p. 416)
"The result is a universe in microcosm." (p.
417)
Before we can apply these principles, we need to
identify what passes for art in Islamia:
* In literature, there are few, if any, novels.
* Some poetry exists.
* In the visual arts, there are few human subjects.
* In sculpture, there are few, if any, human statues.
* Music is largely a monotonous cacophony.
* Islam's greatest expression of beauty is its
architecture, and there are some lovely buildings.
The most conspicuous aspect of Islamic art is its
poverty.
Note the absence of anything human. In fact, note the
absence of anything living. Islam has strong
prohibitions against representing living things in art.
Art, by its very nature, defies Islam. Literature
requires stories about people who have volitional
consciousnesses and face choices. Such freedom is
impermissible in Islam. The visual arts produce
canvases and murals capturing profound values of the
artist, for contemplation by the viewer. Islamic visual
art finds expression solely in things like colored tiles
having various geometric designs. However pretty these
may be, they are no more than skilled crafts.
Music bypasses most of our intellectual mechanisms to
reach our emotions directly. Islamic music is at best
boring, and, at worst, unpleasant.
Architecture allows the greatest artistic expression in
Islam, and even that is greatly truncated. One can only
imagine the incredible frustration that builders and
artisans -- the descendents of the engineers,
architects, and artists who created such structures as
the famed "Hanging Gardens" -- must have felt over the
centuries about having the expression of their talents,
interests, and creativity held down to the level of
decorations.
Islam killed art when it killed philosophy around 900
A.D, and both were killed for much the same reason.
Both art and philosophy stimulate the mind, and active
human minds threaten the very existence of Islam.
Islamic art barely exists at all, and, as we have
indicated, what does exist is devoid of anything
living: There are no paintings of people, no novels
about human values and conflicts, no statues, and no
music that celebrates life.
However, living beings value life. Human beings need
art to present life's deepest values. Art puts these
profound values in a form that enables you to see, to
experience, and to contemplate them. For example, we
cannot directly see "justice," but we can use art to
represent it, often with a statue of a blindfolded woman
holding a scale. In this way, we can contemplate the
essence of "justice." Humanity's need for art is deep
and real, and it is not an "extra," not "fluff."
But, what about all of those photographs of mullahs
carried by teeming Muslims in demonstrations? They
offer human representation, don't they? Aren't they
art? Photographs may present human images, but they are
not art. The definition of art is that it is a
selective recreation of reality, according to the
artist's metaphysical values[2].
Today in America, we have much terrible art that
reflects modern philosophy: It is terrible in its
choices of subjects, terrible in artists' deepest
values, and terrible in qualities of presentations. Too
many movies emphasize violence, sex, and special
effects, instead of value clashes. Too much popular
music is noisy, puerile, and amateurish. Too much
painting and statuary are "non-objective," i.e., without
fundamental value. Too much literature and movies are
"slice of life," and they slice lives not worth knowing
about. Too much contemporary art in modern America
blunts the appreciation of the best that is possible in
life. Life, however, has not been banned from
mainstream American art, and it is flourishing anew in
non-mainstream American art.
Consider the following works of Western art. Compare
them to any equivalent category in Islam.
* Literature: Compare Gone with the Wind, a soaring,
tour de force novel about the entire value-base of a
culture and its permanent destruction over a few short
years, necessitating huge value reformulations. Where
in Islam is there such a profound clash of cultural and
personal values?
* Painting: Compare Botticelli's Birth of Venus to what
in Islam? Islamic painting hardly exists. There is,
however, one Western painting which captures the
metaphysics of Islam (and maybe the thieves have taken
it to Islamia): Edvard Munch's The Scream. This
painting is great art. Everyone who sees it immediately
experiences the values that the artist wants to
communicate -- fear, tension, anxiety, helplessness, and
feelings of being lost. As art, it is light years ahead
of anything in Islamia.
* Sculpture: Compare the elegant, uplifting Victory of
Samothrace to what in Islamia?
* Music: Compare the thrilling works of Rachmaninoff,
John Williams, Bach and so many composers to the
annoying sounds of Islamic music.
* Architecture: Here we can compare vast numbers of
Western buildings to Islamia, but we recognize that
Islam has a structure second to none: the Taj Mahal.
In Islamia, art -- sparse, poor in quality, and dull --
presents non-life. It is as though life does not exist,
but, it is worse than that. Islam disvalues life, and
its esthetics reflects the hatred for life. Islamic art
tries to wipe out all traces of life itself.
In the articles of this series, we have discussed how
Islam makes war on anything important to human beings:
* War on reality, existence, this world
* War on senses and knowledge, on reason, on the human
mind
* War on values, individuals, and the self
* War on freedom of action, of voluntary assembly, on a
society which protects its citizens from the initiation
of physical force
* And, war on life itself.
What could possibly be more evil than this?
In Islam, the mind exists at subsistence level. All
avenues which can offer men and women the way to a human
level of existence, at the conceptual level, with
progress, productivity, prosperity, and happiness, have
been cut off by Islam.
Islam is totally evil.
[1] Leonard Peikoff, Objectivism: The
Philosophy of Ayn Rand, Meridian Books, 1991,
Chapter 12 "Esthetics."
[2] ibid
Summary: Pulling It All Together
In this series, we have examined what Islam contributes
to the five branches of philosophy which are known as
metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and
esthetics. To minimize any difficulty for readers who
are new to this type of analysis, only the most basic
themes of each have been presented, and these have been
stripped to skeletal form.
The themes in these five presentations show why Islam is
what it is, and they show how Islamic philosophy creates
Muslims out of normal human beings. Later, we will use
these principles to demonstrate how Islam produces those
killer robots (kill-bots) known as "jihadists."
In practice, the branches of philosophy Islamic or
otherwise -- do not act as five independent units. They
work together and depend on each other, and they have
produced Islamia in its entirety -- the culture and its
practitioners, the Muslims.
Philosophy is intensely practical, and all of its
elements fit together. The philosophies we refer to are
the philosophies actually adopted by people, not some
academic gobbledygook, which is taught in so many
universities. In fact, philosophies are not only
intensely practical, but they are absolutely
unavoidable.
How each person comes by his philosophy is usually sadly
haphazard and totally implicit. People pick up their
philosophies from their parents, schools, and culture,
and most people leave these vital guiding principles in
their unidentified, and often contradictory state.
Muslims as well as Americans reap the consequences of
the ideas they have accepted, whether they know in so
many words what their ideas are -- no one can escape his
or her own philosophy. This is unfortunate, since
philosophy is not "self-evident," and like any other
discipline, can and should be taught, just as
mathematics, literature, or biology can and should be
taught.
What we view, hear, and read about the state of Islamic
culture today describes Islamia as it has been for
fourteen centuries. Islamia is dreadful because its
ideas -- its philosophy -- is dreadful. It is Islamic
philosophy that manufactures jihadists, not the usual
liberal-Marxist excuses of poverty, lack of opportunity,
and environmental conditioning.
The facts which underlie absolutely everything are
called "metaphysics." When philosophers refer to
"metaphysics," they do not mean any of the stuff which
"New Agers" call "metaphysics." New Age "metaphysics" is
nothing more than low quality mysticism, contributing
nothing to anyone's understanding of anything.
Everything in the universe -- absolutely everything, all
of existence -- depends on these basic metaphysical
facts, and people adopt either a realistic or an
unrealistic relationship with them.
The realistic relationship accepts the universe "as
is." Whether they think about it at all or not,
realists know that the universe is what they see, touch
and feel, taste, hear, and smell. This relationship
permits the acquisition of knowledge, and it has made
possible the many benefits of Western civilization.
Islam devalues this relationship with reality. It
attributes everything in the universe to its unknowable
"super-entity," named Allah.
Allah instills fear and uncertainty. The universe, all
of existence, is portrayed as something unpredictable,
uncertain, and incomprehensible to the human mind.
Allah runs the universe solely by means of whim. He is
a mean, jealous, and utterly sadistic being. In fact,
he runs Hell all by himself and punishes and punishes
and punishes. Muslims, cut off from reality, live in
abject fear of Allah and of life.
Islam views human kind as corrupt by its nature:
Everything that promotes joy and pleasure on this earth
is regarded as evil, as a "temptation," a distraction
from their "true" goal, the spread of Islam.
This Islamic approach to life, to existence, and to all
knowledge, pulls the rug out from under the Muslim
mind. It replaces a knowable universe with a
demon-infested maelstrom of Allah, Iblis, jinni, angels,
and evil eyes. Islam gives Muslims an unknowable,
unpredictable, and terror-filled world because their
minds have had reality, their frame of reference for
everything, taken from them. Islam detaches Muslim
minds from reality.
Islam goes on next to attack the human mind through its
mystical epistemology. It does so by asserting that
knowledge comes from Allah by means of "revelation."
"Revelation" refers to knowledge attained by mystical,
non-sensory, non-cognitive means. However, in reality,
no one learns or knows anything whatsoever by means of
revelation. In fact, there is no such thing as
"revelation." To prevent exposure of the truth
arising by those who would question Islam, it outlaws
reason, and it literally orders the death of anyone who
dares to question.
To be a Muslim, you must abandon reason and accept
faith, which means that you must shut off the uniquely
human characteristic, the reasoning mind.
We are through only two of the five branches of
philosophy, and Islam has already accomplished the feat
of destroying reality and reason for its believers.
Such believers would be helpless, as Islam intends for
them to be, and would be desperate for some way to guide
their lives. In fact, the Islamic assault on reality
and the mind renders Muslims ready to be programmed
according to the requirements of Islam. They are given
the ethics of Islam, which are so detailed that they
govern every aspect of every Muslims life "24/7." There
are "rules" on everything from the proper time and way
to trim one's nails, to how to wipe oneself after
defecating.
Islamic ethics holds self-sacrificial service to Allah
and Islam to be the highest good. Surrender,
submission, and obedience prepare the Muslim to be
programmed to die for Allah. No choice is possible for
the Muslim, according to Islam.
In three branches of philosophy, Islam takes reason and
reality away from Muslims, and its ethics takes away any
individuality. Duty and sacrifice replace choice and
individuality. Still, the Muslim is an empty vessel.
Islam takes this empty vessel, and, through its
politics, turns him into a something altogether inhuman.
Islamic politics fuses Islam with every detail of the
state and even life itself. Islam builds a collective
of all Muslims, called the ummah. Muslims must practice
allegiance to Allah, to Islam, and to the ummah. The
collectivist politics of Islam designs and constructs an
identity for believers, and blends them into a seamless
mass, a syncitium.
To this collective, this mass, this syncitium, Islam
provides not only an identity, but also a purpose in
life for Muslims en masse. That purpose is perpetual
jihad, or holy war, waged against all non-Muslims
globally. The goal of jihad is to create a Muslim
planet, a totalitarian Muslim collective, which
Islamists intend to run. The methods Islam has used to
attain this objective have been conquest, murder, theft,
pillage, rape, and enslavement, facilitated by the
Islamic belief that non-Muslims have no value. Death
during jihad for one of these Muslim "killer robots"
means that he has achieved Islam's highest value, and he
goes to join Allah's Paradise in the unknowable world
which he has accepted on faith.
The final major branch of Islamic philosophy, esthetics,
pulls together all of Islam's importance for Muslims and
it reflects what our lives would mean under Islamism.
Art should show what might be and ought to be in life.
However, Islamic art is devoid not only of anything
human, but it is devoid of anything living. Islamic art
is lifeless. This is because Islam is anti-life in
every important way, and humans do not even register so
much as a flicker of importance in Islam, except as cogs
working on behalf of the collective. No beauty, no fun,
no celebration, no grandeur are allowed in Islam, and
its art reflects Islam's sterility. It is the stillness
of death.
Islam is the great destroyer, and its philosophy causes
the destruction. Millions of humans over 14 centuries
have had their lives sterilized and squandered by
Islam. The luckier ones died or were killed early in
their existence. All the rest have endured living hell.
These are the main currents of the ideas we must fight
with better ideas. Our ideas and our civilization are
superior in every way. If we do not come to appreciate
this superiority and to use it shamelessly for our own
good, we could well succumb to the evils of Islam. We
cannot fight with political correctness, cultural
relativism, multiculturalism, epistemological and
ethical relativism, or by embracing any of the
collectivist political philosophies we find ourselves
sliding into by default.
Our cause has not been lost. It just has not been won.
[This
presentation of Islamic philosophy and its
contrast to ours has been kept intentionally short.
Much additional material about this subject deserves
discussion. For that, I strongly recommend Leonard
Peikoff's, Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn
Rand, Meridian Books, 1991.] |